01
Contracts get reviewed at the speed they arrive
Clauses are extracted and checked against your own playbook, so the queue stops being the reason a deal waits.
2 Legal AI Agents, Live in Production.
2 live legal agents across 2 processes — contract review and clause-level risk checks.
-
Contract Drafting
Draft an agreement from your own clause library, then check it against a completeness checklist and repair anything missing.
-
NDA Analyzer
Review one or more NDAs against a standard clause checklist, with risk levels and the quoted text behind each rating.
Legal AI Agents: Drafting From Your Own Clause Library, Quoting the Text Behind Every Rating
In-house legal capacity is the constraint on a great deal of commercial activity, and most of what consumes it is not judgement. Producing a first draft from an existing clause library, and reviewing an NDA against a standard checklist, are both structured tasks with a well-defined right answer — and both currently require a lawyer’s time because the alternative is a business team drafting for itself. That is how non-standard terms enter agreements: not through negotiation but through someone assembling a document from the last similar one.
The two agents here take the structured part and are built to be checkable. The drafting agent works from your own clause library rather than generating language, then tests the result against a completeness checklist and repairs what is missing — so the output contains your approved wording, not a plausible approximation of it. The review agent rates an NDA against a standard clause checklist and quotes the text behind each rating, which is the difference between a tool a lawyer can use and one they have to redo. A risk level with no quoted clause is an assertion; a risk level with the clause attached is a starting point for a decision that takes two minutes instead of twenty.
Contract Lifecycle
Drafting from your clause library, then repairing what the checklist finds missing
What this moves
- Drafts containing approved wording
- The agreement is assembled from your own clause library rather than generated, so the language in it is language your legal function has already accepted.
- Agreements sent with a clause missing
- The draft is tested against a completeness checklist and the gaps repaired before it leaves, catching the omission that a read-through does not.
Contract Review
Quoting the clause behind every risk rating
What this moves
- Ratings a reviewer can act on directly
- Each risk level carries the quoted text it was based on, so a lawyer verifies rather than re-reads the whole agreement.
- NDAs reviewed without waiting for legal capacity
- Review against a standard clause checklist runs immediately, so a routine agreement does not queue behind substantive work.
What this changes
What legal agents do for the business
In plain terms, without the engineering detail. The individual agent pages carry the technical specifics.
02
Counsel sees only what differs
The agent flags where a contract departs from your standard position and cites the clause. Reading the whole document to find three changes is the part that goes away.
03
The decision stays with a lawyer
These agents surface and evidence; they do not advise. That boundary is deliberate and it is what makes the output usable.
- Where deviations are flagged
- Clause level
- Every flag points at the text
- Cited
- Decides, always
- Counsel
Where to start
Start with clause extraction on your highest-volume agreement type — usually NDAs or standard supplier terms. The playbook already exists informally, and writing it down is most of the setup.
Next Step
Deploying legal agents into your stack
These run as-is, and most engagements adapt one to the way your process actually works — different source systems, different tolerances, a different approval path. The first call establishes which base agent fits and what has to change.